receipts derived

{
  "input": {
    "type": "http",
    "method": "GET",
    "queryParams": {
      "url": "example.xyz",
      "chain": "base",
      "address": "0x532f27101965dd16442E59d40670FaF5eBB142E4"
    }
  },
  "output": {
    "type": "json",
    "example": {
      "data": {
        "market": {
          "liquidity_usd": 210000
        },
        "safety": {
          "is_honeypot": false
        },
        "holders": {
          "top10_holder_pct": 61.4
        },
        "narrative": {
          "counts": {
            "consistent": 7,
            "inconsistent": 1
          }
        },
        "exit_depth": {
          "five_pct_impact_usd": 41000
        }
      },
      "chain": "base",
      "flags": [
        "Top-10 non-LP wallets hold 61.4% of supply",
        "Site claims \"liquidity locked 12 months\"; observed LP locked/burned share is 4.2%"
      ],
      "token": {
        "name": "Example",
        "symbol": "EXM",
        "holders": "48213"
      },
      "checks": [
        {
          "check": "sell_simulation",
          "detail": "Sell simulation succeeded — not flagged as a honeypot",
          "result": "pass"
        },
        {
          "check": "holder_concentration",
          "detail": "Top-10 non-LP wallets hold 61.4% of supply",
          "result": "flag"
        },
        {
          "check": "narrative_consistency",
          "detail": "1 of 8 site claims does not match observed chain data",
          "result": "flag"
        }
      ],
      "address": "0x…",
      "explorer": "https://basescan.org/token/0x…",
      "disclaimer": "A structured set of observable on-chain facts and consistency checks at a point in time — the receipts, not a rating. Check results describe data, never intent, and nothing here is financial, legal or investment advice, a recommendation, or a prediction. Some checks can be inconclusive when upstream data is unavailable; the report says so rather than guessing.",
      "checks_passed": "7/9",
      "coverage_tier": "full"
    }
  }
}