dmarc record audit derived
api.zfinia.comCommunicationsderived
POST https://api.zfinia.com/x402/v1/dmarc-record-audit
passabsent from every registry#6 by calls of 15 on this host
0.18 USDC
per call, as the listing declares it on eip155:
Compare with anotherEvery figure as JSONCite this page
the price, as of 2026-10-04 21:22 UTC · method
- Validation state
- pass
- Uptime, 7 / 30 / 90 days
- — / 100% / 100%
- Calls, trailing 30 days
- 1
- Unique payers, trailing 30 days
- 1
- Last called
- 2026-10-04 08:41 UTC
- First observed by TOLLderived
- 2026-10-04
- Pricederived
- 0.18 USDC
- Networks
- 1
How big is this endpoint among the ones like it?
No trace is drawn of this endpoint’s own volume. Its counters have changed 1 time across 2 observations, and 3 changes are the fewest this site will draw a trace through, because two points and a guess are not a series. Every observation is in the JSON.
Among the 15 endpoints on api.zfinia.com, dmarc record audit is tied 6th by calls with 10 others.
Requests carry a json body with the fields domain and record.
dmarc record audit returns json; the example shows tags, valid, domain, limits, passed, policy and 2 others.
dmarc record audit drew a single call from a single payer in the trailing 30 days.
The last call to dmarc record audit came 28 days before the snapshot, 2026-10-04.
Each call is priced at 0.18 USDC, payable on Base.
dmarc record audit takes 3% of the calls counted across api.zfinia.com.
TOLL files dmarc record audit under communications: a POST endpoint on api.zfinia.com, listed in neither registry at the last pull.
dmarc record audit answered the sweep of 2026-10-04 with a valid 402, as at every sweep since 2026-10-04.
Closest in price to dmarc record audit within communications: profiles email at api.linkedpanda.com and open inbox at ausca.com.
dmarc record audit is near the top of prices in communications; 94% of comparable listings are cheaper.
The wallet paid by dmarc record audit is the payee of 179 endpoints across 5 hosts.
Seller tags: dmarc, email authentication, domain trust and dns.
dmarc record audit was missing from the Coinbase registry at the pull of 2026-10-05, confirmed at the pull of 2026-10-05; that is registry presence, not liveness.
Where the sentences above compare this endpoint with others, the comparison is against the index as it stands now, live; the figures above are final.
the payment options, as of 2026-10-04 21:22 UTC · method
| registry | network | asset | amount | scheme | pay to |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coinbase | eip155: | USDC | 0.18 USDC | exact | 0x25e824…6a9608 |
the checks, as of 2026-10-04 12:58 UTC · methodendpoint answered HTTP 402
No named check failed.
Every sweep that observed this endpoint, newest first.
| observed, UTC | state | failed checks | sweep |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-04 12:58 UTC | pass | 0 | daily-2026-10-04 |
| 2026-10-04 12:25 UTC | pass | 0 | new-after-daily-2026-10-04 |
Presence in a registry, not liveness of the service (method). Newest first.
- absence from Coinbase confirmed, rule v1
- absent from Coinbase at this pull
- listed in Coinbase
From the registry record, not validated by TOLL.the declared schema, as of 2026-10-04 08:41 UTC · method
The input and output block
{
"input": {
"body": {
"domain": "example.test",
"record": "v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=25; rua=mailto:dmarc@reports.vendor.test; adkim=s; ri=86400; policy=strict"
},
"type": "http",
"method": "POST",
"bodyType": "json"
},
"output": {
"type": "json",
"example": {
"tags": {
"p": "quarantine",
"v": "DMARC1",
"ri": "86400",
"sp": "none",
"pct": "25",
"rua": "mailto:dmarc@reports.vendor.test",
"adkim": "s",
"policy": "strict"
},
"valid": false,
"domain": "example.test",
"limits": {
"maxRecords": 2000,
"maxFindings": 500,
"maxHeaderBytes": 131072,
"maxIncludeTree": 200,
"spfLookupLimit": 10,
"maxRecordLength": 4096,
"spfVoidLookupLimit": 2
},
"passed": false,
"policy": "quarantine",
"complete": true,
"findings": [
{
"tag": "pct",
"code": "POLICY_APPLIED_TO_PART_OF_MAIL",
"detail": "The record declares pct=25, so the policy applies to 25% of failing mail and the rest is treated as p=none. A rollout left here is not the policy it appears to be."
},
{
"tag": "sp",
"code": "SUBDOMAIN_POLICY_WEAKER",
"detail": "The record declares p=quarantine and sp=none, so a subdomain is treated more leniently than the organisational domain. Anything spoofing a subdomain gets the weaker treatment."
},
{
"tag": "rua",
"code": "REPORTING_TO_EXTERNAL_DOMAIN",
"detail": "The rua tag sends reports to reports.vendor.test, which is outside example.test. That requires reports.vendor.test to publish a record authorising it, and without one no reports are sent at all."
}
],
"percentage": 25,
"request_id": "example-request",
"service_id": "dmarc_record_audit",
"assumptions": [
"Nothing resolves DNS. The record is supplied, so an arbitrary domain can be audited without widening any egress.",
"A pct below 100 is reported because the tag applies to quarantine and reject and never to reporting, so a rollout left part way is routinely read as being further along than it is.",
"Reporting to a domain other than the one being audited is reported, because that needs an authorising record at the destination and without one no reports are sent at all."
],
"limitations": [
"The record supplied. Whether it is published, whether reports are actually received, and what any receiver does with the policy are outside this. Not a security assessment.",
"valid is true only when the record parsed, every tag was recognised, and nothing was left unexamined."
],
"observed_at": "2026-10-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"not_examined": [],
"finding_count": 4,
"spf_alignment": "r",
"dkim_alignment": "s",
"service_version": "1.0.0",
"findings_by_code": {
"TAG_NOT_RECOGNISED": 1,
"SUBDOMAIN_POLICY_WEAKER": 1,
"REPORTING_TO_EXTERNAL_DOMAIN": 1,
"POLICY_APPLIED_TO_PART_OF_MAIL": 1
},
"subdomain_policy": "none",
"forensic_reporting": null,
"aggregate_reporting": "mailto:dmarc@reports.vendor.test"
}
}
}Cite this page
This endpoint is delisted: the page is frozen at its last observation and its live URL is the stable one. Data reuse is under CC BY 4.0 (terms).
Plain text
TOLL, "dmarc record audit on api.zfinia.com". https://tollindex.com/e/api-zfinia-com-x402-v1-dmarc-record-audit-2e02e0. Accessed [access date].
BibTeX
@misc{toll-e-api-zfinia-com-x402-v1-dmarc-record-audit-2e02e0-2026-11-01,
author = {TOLL},
title = {dmarc record audit on api.zfinia.com},
howpublished = {\url{https://tollindex.com/e/api-zfinia-com-x402-v1-dmarc-record-audit-2e02e0}},
year = {2026},
month = {11},
note = {Frozen at its last observation, 2026-11-01 05:59 UTC. Accessed [access date].}
}None yet. Anything submitted through the form below is published here with its outcome.